Bernard-Henri Lévy

The Art of Philosophy is Only Worthwhile if it is an Art of War.

Philosopher contre Hegel et les néo­hégéliens. Philosopher contre l'inter­prétation pré-Bataille, et pré-Collège de sociologie, de la politique de Nietzsche. Philosopher contre le néo-platonisme et son démon de l'absolu. Philosopher contre Bergson et son avatar, justement, deleuzien. Philosopher contre la volonté de pureté, ou de guérir, dont j'ai démontré ailleurs qu'elle est la vraie matrice de ce qu'on a appelé, trop vite, les totalitarismes et qu'une guerre conceptuelle bien menée permet de mieux nommer. Philosopher pour nuire à ceux qui m'empêchent d'écrire et de philosopher. Philosopher pour empêcher, un peu, les imbéciles et les salauds de pavoiser. Philosopher contre Badiou. Philosopher contre la gidouille Zizek. Philosopher contre le parti du sommeil, des clowns ou des radicalités meurtrières. Pardon, mais c'est la vérité. Chaque fois que j'ai, depuis trente ans, fait un peu de philosophie c'est ainsi que j'ai opéré : dans une conjoncture donnée, compte tenu d'un problème ou d'une situation déterminés, identifier un ennemi et, l'ayant identifié, soit le tenir en respect, soit, parfois, le réduire ou le faire reculer. Guerre de guérilla, encore. Harcèlement. Et à la guerre comme à la guerre.

His philosophy

One of the reasons that motivated me to create this site in 1999 was the attacks against Bernard-Henri Lévy the philosopher. Or, to be precise, it was due to too many people I found little willing to recognize in Lévy a true philosopher. A decade later, things haven’t changed. I always hear the same old refrain, “Lévy isn’t a real philosopher, he hasn’t invented any real concepts”. And moreover, I should say (as I often have over the years, to the man in question) that Lévy himself, too modest, too busy dabbling in just about everything, too indifferent to criticism, doesn’t always help us, doesn’t help himself, to make the truth triumph. Hence this new rubric. To me, it is essential. I believe it is essential as well for him, so as to show the true worth of his work. Besides being a writer, a journalist, an adventurer, a firebrand, director of a review, a militant, and a courageous man, Lévy is above and beyond all, indeed, above all, a philosopher—and that, with the help of my staff, is what I intend to prove here. I know his work, I think, better than most of his detractors. There is not one of his books that I have not commented on extensively, here in the United States, in the French Review. And this miniscule privilege gives me the right, I think 1) to remind others that Bernard-Henri Lévy has had an academic career that would make his detractors turn green with envy; 2) to establish the catalogue raisonné of the masters with whom he has studied; 3) to draw up the list of both the concepts he has conceived and those to which he has imparted a new sense. I listen to my students and former students of Hofstra University. I observe, on the net, in the United States, in Europe, and elsewhere, the groups that have been formed whose reflections are based upon Lévy’s concepts. To all of them, I wish to say that they are the ones who are right. “Lévyism” does exist. It is possible, and fruitful, to be a Lévyist. I am giving myself a few months, with whomever wishes to do so, to outline the contours of this Lévyism and demonstrate its substance. Professeur Liliane Lazar, Hofstra University.